From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id mLZJIVI3vGOzBwAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 16:48:34 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id wFZKIVI3vGP3cQAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 16:48:34 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B4AB3C681 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:48:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEuNY-0000Nr-Q3; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:48:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEuNT-0000Nc-Rj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:47:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEuNR-0007d1-Ck for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:47:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c3903811; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:47:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=20190914; bh=PoLQQ36fWtnuVgGx0WpooNLiqwppDjoACx +sVoJTOF8=; b=Q0v7vfDlSJEpGPr9E7WE3ROE9BZFljs9qLrDFuEpvaKs+jGCRJ zVY59CvPVwnO/9GGt5pGe2B5dlwnNUuSp7qafWw5r8zEVhLSaK+q1fPBgMRCkl5/ cyFIzbA/Hdf/aKzO+JfblsDlWFixcXQAOYrKBNvWfktGvTUU1Wu5Luh6MWP3SvVo bmzF8//e0bNfPf15asivWn2EvahC4TSyPmgJbtRoNmfoCXtcHk061AgbrpDtYoVB WD0oPcNyNy2CpvzZkqQt+V8q9P0ISiHHVn5NraxDmdLVWUbDBO4RJQvhhMXq77Rx xsMaooG8F50kjPhAioBsj0VuAWl4mMlTei7w== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 34fc57d8; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:47:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 81adf74f; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:47:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f0442938 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:47:51 +0100 (CET) From: Joshua Branson To: Paul Jewell via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." Cc: Paul Jewell Subject: Re: Command consistency: suggestion In-Reply-To: (Paul Jewell via's message of "Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:22:48 +0000") References: X-Gnus-Sucks: I know man Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:47:43 -0500 Message-ID: <875ydf90bk.fsf@dismail.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1673279314; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=sDPR+oNmJEjlOpeXQyr8dEryeDiTSVpeaqOvPx+N/PATqrq/AIjimmX8keZLKRwdEy7xSK 5WCDrk4A1GK2kZJ6TBM0kxfjyK9OzIYN8dy5sEl2UPr+NbRlM/Do4jLNsldaqbXfgN5Bzc 4dHaDMet6EzqErtvPD24JnLV3blhr/p62VNIqlYPfRDr7aKyMP0BnTkianWIKKLfEgGE+Z Teg3lWCEQZEk/PLuT7EH3cNqp8RUgSgZm+DeOcLWQpg3pHnqD33SYgeGezFV7CawUA79qR 3plKI83se3u8fzb+HlU5YVuLWrp1fxfIPkB+TYymlUG48ru/m2UDcN3gUwv/7Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=Q0v7vfDl; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1673279314; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=PoLQQ36fWtnuVgGx0WpooNLiqwppDjoACx+sVoJTOF8=; b=kpvdR/UNRYectymVQ6e4zRX0q1u9N15SnEGveAUdMy2UJnjCXVRxEDxWKxHVr6njTC5nNd H2jW8QYzUEIDqWRQJQ9rDifaYwPrUHC9Sap95xaZt9aupYDm7gQuI7Lxl4NQZ4LEhK8J5q IEghNmy4SekvYtcMqgWcFdb1ITqLE5G1s9VJptLw2gDcborhZHc/2kiHfmiqjpUJSTVfcy ucv0d7+uSIgIn6sqpqRgoR7b+NsjWdRa9iu4vuU9T+nBO8q3dSimZQvceSdlwnHOMpnmmy NeaCPXK/VjrlxuNvxp7OVv1QLDjg5kty2FT0Wz+7+DpaBqMT5N9W3sanf2+TNQ== X-Spam-Score: -8.95 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4B4AB3C681 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=Q0v7vfDl; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.95 X-TUID: 4ENzYGPiiiB9 Paul Jewell via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." writes: > Good morning! > > It struck me this weekend that there is some difference in the command structure > for the different guix sub commands. For example: > > guix package --list-generations > > and > > guix system list-generations > > guix package has everything as an flag, but guix system (and guix home) uses the > concept of ACTION with options and arguments. > > Perhaps the latter is clearer, and guix package should also follow the same > model? +1