Christopher Baines writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Good signature from 5E28A33B0B84F577 Christopher Baines (trust ultimate) created at 2023-05-25T10:18:32+0100 using RSA]] > > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>> Christopher Baines skribis: >> >>>> Maybe the branch could be rebased or master could be merged in? If you >>>> pick the latest commit with a green tick by it from [1], then that >>>> should mean the data service is able to perform the comparison. >>> >>> Sounds like a plan. Nicolas? >> >> I rebased the branch on top of c57693846c7c6586c6cd1b4e4002fe399e3a2c42, >> which is as green-ticked as a commit can be. > > Awesome, the comparison is available now. I've also got the qa-frontpage > to find this issue and start submitting builds (this time for most > systems, not just x86_64-linux). > > The QA link at the top (of https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63521 ) should > now also take you to the relevant page. > > There's now some waiting to do for the builds to happen, but also more > work needed on the qa-frontpage to better show any breakages and > failures that occur. So I still need to do this, however the more significant problem is that master has diverged significantly (in part at least due to the eudev change [1] not going to core-updates/another branch). 1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-05/msg00330.html I've got the qa-frontpage to flag this now, so there should be a warning at the top of [2] saying there's too many changes between the merge base and master. 2: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/tex-team Would you be able to rebase the branch again? Thanks, Chris