From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0EyoK7D6UGZpQgEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 24 May 2024 22:38:08 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0EyoK7D6UGZpQgEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 24 May 2024 22:38:08 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lease-up.com header.s=2017 header.b=pUWTtGcK; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1716583088; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=hcj3zSIawWo2S2d8rg8uVi6AlIgmNYfAjoccJ1O9ewo4o2AlX9agA139HjHgdYqOM8ikHh IV6zGaGY+eFyXAahdDhHgXEDy/NE/P/6XThn3MR6hea2S9x5rs9D5+onxwk9poaoQ7LWz6 kNqVqvJYzZjSpMbm+p11FXqrM+YRX9J1l19BpfeOadNqY5xMynEKxULdvQt9owGJM5FlzS t7OAcYobAyHlSOqx/EtS9An7In5bz6p0VSUE9UAU0CdjcI7DL7xeBp7VYmMQoigBee4Wo0 x+qR//rSG5rwSf5IqdEMQyntrAWGUkASBkV1BOmBtkAWMUo/DSgxVRCHF2EMQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lease-up.com header.s=2017 header.b=pUWTtGcK; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1716583088; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=5cujdD7AybIvUTWP/Fo85a/dCLwTm+r9WgVs6/cb0bk=; b=PUL9Mp+WASSAs8fwpoy9HaDe4qFRCgo55w6LJ27yToy8Rpw0BV4hX4TMXPFhtbJvgWBxeU xzXMSmu7BwMVsfN3kzoLTD0KPJBdt5xDf29VU+A5UI6w/3hBMB8r5au1Od6X0T/9OFtg// Vh/PMP7+qy0uhCj6XBLRfi3lWoo6GvMej0aa96UkqRuVIP7OVMEL6b+n5e1nXkAVcSypxV drASSwTiBZ2noOE/RI5qiFpnHOA3qXHmqQ08mdrxbhZfxMYWYnXoKsqMCccM3KQ6Rlkb3T 8wIvxNRICxmqvwzPXJZj9LIo7yb8XpE2K6kpoeyIwWdTxpxLRdqMNtuOqH5SUQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C3CA1D142 for ; Fri, 24 May 2024 22:38:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sAbev-0000UH-GC; Fri, 24 May 2024 16:37:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sAbet-0000Tv-8F for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2024 16:36:59 -0400 Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sAbep-0003HL-UQ; Fri, 24 May 2024 16:36:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=7Za97GFPkTSndcB Kce//ge1MM1ff3de4y+YEUOGd1WU=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=lease-up.com; b=pUWTtGcKrNkZVWYspOFM680jNitchioK+/LpwhoV pNiyKyO9BWLEaUitSV+10+t0s/Iv3ycJRhuE5AQxCK0+511Xn6hpw8faqVXPtCIUpGzRC2 PNZouUMXJUwHy87JHzjP3O5DjdsRw1H8powjP0AD9V2VukU+s+JTksBn4eW3c= Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ee8ffcff (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Fri, 24 May 2024 20:36:45 +0000 (UTC) To: Ashvith Shetty , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: `make check` fails when trying to build from Git In-Reply-To: References: <87ttjbjlec.fsf@gnu.org> <87v83n3xji.fsf@gnu.org> <87ikzg69d7.fsf@gnu.org> <87msoo5v5k.fsf@gnu.org> <87plth3mxb.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 13:36:45 -0700 Message-ID: <875xv3rlpe.fsf@lease-up.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=208.82.101.137; envelope-from=felix.lechner@lease-up.com; helo=sail-ipv4.us-core.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Felix Lechner From: Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 2C3CA1D142 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.85 X-Spam-Score: -6.85 X-TUID: lhr+2A9TMwQM Hi Ashvith, On Fri, May 24 2024, Ashvith Shetty wrote: > I'll be [...] continuing this discussion on bug-guix@gnu.org, as I > think that it would be an apt place to discuss. It isn't. Any message sent to bug-guix@gnu.org will open a new, numbered report on debbugs.gnu.org. You could discuss your issue, after opening such a report, at REPORT_NUMBER@debbugs.gnu.org. Please make sure to carbon-copy any additional participants. By default, Debbugs notfies no one except when closing a report. Before filing a new report it is, however, customary to look first if another similar report is open already. Then the relevant conversations happen in one place. One way to search would be to access the same group of reports at https://issues.guix.gnu.org/ Good luck! Kind regards Felix P.S. To everyone, I'm a beekeeper. Please don't call your reports "bugs." Let's call them reports. I'll try to remember, too.