Re: bug#72686: Impossible to remove all offload machines

[Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 702 bytes --]


Hello,

Ian Eure <ian@retrospec.tv> writes:

> Disregard this, I continued thinking after sending the email (as one does) and
> realized that any managed file will be a link into the store -- so if the system
> is reconfigured with no build-machines or channels *and* the corresponding file
> is a store link, it should be removed; otherwise, it should remain untouched. I
> can work with this.

Will this correctly handle cases where user is managing the file using
for example extra-special-file?

I wonder whether fat-warning approach would not be better.

Tomas

-- 
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 853 bytes --]