From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0MzyKdVeGmfLeQEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:51:01 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0MzyKdVeGmfLeQEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:51:01 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=ulAMDpNb; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=systemreboot.net header.s=default header.b="b31A/vn6"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=systemreboot.net (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1729781461; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=HLE1YkcOopg/pXE++Y4W4SkAjinbRhS15KwpMlCLP5E=; b=AilSfizpW7vRlVxItN1nAklBcSsLMwAtm5LXghaRduwb9VtlcRwE6COoW9dE/IUjMjweLA ZKVscY891Kvz1bUC5sRBmCNcgEaJpGkfWCh2oxfKaN6m9dHd5rcmEV941vPgRVr7yIsxnV RiNsT+nsFW6fnvOR9fOxkYoAO9Sk3E+Y2sFwbAuW5elXdF79KmXC4QXryW0CBr1+IuqZvk PUZvsnCEQesbfiqN/9AT+7GVybMwmy03R43x2mmnDCBVIaTu2ayF95CUVlAn42QKQgPOle ZYBQ2IPISAJ0LAkOMprqZkoZlE1fIJh/PO18/Lh3sjEwDhPYaY7ArtBHUABCMg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1729781461; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RWD8c0FZXE2ch2wm4eGXwbXFoy1wyB0VYTHeyvagtAawNZldIPvaFXDC+VM0sHQBGLi0/i Um0RCbBf4HLpQKWxyS+qv/cKjefUsazCxv/Ll6fylfSQLoztTbxm1YYzy/xj6ErcROf/48 IfSQKHxZA8ZYuAcSfJe9TOFMLyLEUBSuu2k3K6hw+mFj5QrpVOoK2+JliLZcotsr52tMlR 9rOrKXAK/G9ivQqqZadzV1NrrvNWjkaBGZqQD9RPc5gyvfWAYnRi3/IzjgwBp9K8IPXlpQ fxP+fp5xRplIJLe2gmhij1JI/9MEwH0P5FXAgKD89ZLMCF+24g6NtyYYRHms+w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=ulAMDpNb; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=systemreboot.net header.s=default header.b="b31A/vn6"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=systemreboot.net (policy=none) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48A74507F6 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:51:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t3zAY-0006YG-Kq; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:50:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t3zAW-0006Xl-9m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:50:33 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t3zAW-0002zy-08 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:50:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=HLE1YkcOopg/pXE++Y4W4SkAjinbRhS15KwpMlCLP5E=; b=ulAMDpNbdm1AWcErQuZLvUaci7HDJR+UyQFozYxWJr7vUMtDNGEJjMAD1LSokPZ6BYrl+xWb63gvSGgiucIKzSJTfbenndauN4sXq7ZkfQvzw2gYJ18skBRWcGS7pE9LQ+tmg5OdepWBoojtibebee186Eek/EGfBQJSSxa0J5mKLexNSP/7P8G7sQcgGW4RO6xixJCWWCivrRQvAkXxBS7lj/DhP4relXzZsUY8lO3tXvqzue69PaBBghtT7xh1/ogeD4uEfhkn5hGhQTrYFSwQvO+CnpsVjlChaACM8YJheepCwB5WGMc6Bn6rj2c4aUGHIblpHtpLf9yussUwOg==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t3zB0-00080I-F9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#72766] [PATCH v3 2/2] gnu: slurm: Move client executables into separate output. Resent-From: Arun Isaac Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 72766 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 72766@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 72766-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B72766.172978145730751 (code B ref 72766); Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:51:02 +0000 Received: (at 72766) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2024 14:50:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35871 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t3zAu-0007zv-Mb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:50:56 -0400 Received: from mugam.systemreboot.net ([139.59.75.54]:49612) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t3zAp-0007zX-TI for 72766@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:50:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=systemreboot.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HLE1YkcOopg/pXE++Y4W4SkAjinbRhS15KwpMlCLP5E=; b=b31A/vn6BVtJ9orbmiNZjcIV9P bIHhmEXseeUy26oFzY4qpylpVz3QpUiC8nNCUYWFGcxbSJhj3moPCRBSlHCd4EVOPt5xMygfK7GH2 9csmdsiFdskaWUVAaMq0ouBe4xrs0t0EStpEf4F7FM0F1k688UsyFXqQPNruLSXAyoow6SrzuaBzc sEu5hOXDxSPvacmuenu7/yoaq0CWLZ8BmH+F3Nu/nqYgnIqTfp9Gj92PeXfkanLpQ/VlFdPR9FA+c DSnufu525ILmOxZagrlhL7Cxfg2pBPkcwU/KWjpEAlWGmv9zhuNxN2Q1EtqDGXZN5X5v1iGRwyXh2 mx5JxdrA==; Received: from [192.168.2.1] (port=50204 helo=localhost) by systemreboot.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1t3z48-000000002q8-1456; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:43:56 +0100 From: Arun Isaac In-Reply-To: <87plnp251n.fsf@inria.fr> References: <87plnp251n.fsf@inria.fr> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:50:10 +0100 Message-ID: <875xpha731.fsf@systemreboot.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 1.55 X-Spam-Score: 1.55 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 48A74507F6 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-TUID: Bd/jQvT+0B/x Hi Ludo, > I think =E2=80=9Cbin=E2=80=9D would be a more conventional name for the o= utput; this is > used in a couple of packages and recognized by =E2=80=98package->recutils= =E2=80=99. Sure, fixed now. > However, what does =E2=80=98guix size slurm:client=E2=80=99 report? I su= spect it > depends on slurm:out, in which case moving to a separate output makes no > difference from that perspective. Yep, that's right. $ ./pre-inst-env guix size slurm:out | tail -n1 total: 192.6 MiB $ ./pre-inst-env guix size slurm:bin | tail -n1 total: 201.3 MiB $ ./pre-inst-env guix size slurm:bin | grep slurm /gnu/store/2qhgkq79ahw64n4kmr3znl8v66z0n87j-slurm-23.11.10 192.6 = 17.5 8.7% /gnu/store/6f3d93i0zdr48v6bp471dfsk7r89xdqh-slurm-23.11.10-bin 201.3 = 1.3 0.6% Should I then go back to the idea of creating a slurm-minimal variant? Regards, Arun