From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Porting to mips64el
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:44:54 +0100
Message-ID: <874ninz3m1.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <8738yvnslh.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87y5gfa7t9.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87vcbjldp5.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87zk0v4e29.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87wqvzclyj.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87ehi71bl6.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87pq1rma9g.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87wqvyxvhv.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87lic3vm8s.fsf@karetnikov.org> <871udv6bny.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87d2xfk9qb.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87k3rnr61e.fsf@gnu.org>
	<871udvwna6.fsf@karetnikov.org> <876237bdqu.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87y5g2uzbj.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87y5g2kp8s.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87d2xc4azh.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87a9sfc0hq.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87r4lrpf0n.fsf@karetnikov.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53851)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TtoHU-0006j1-Ls
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:45:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TtoHQ-0004qr-GP
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:45:00 -0500
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:34603)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1TtoHQ-0004qn-9N
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:44:56 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87r4lrpf0n.fsf@karetnikov.org> (Nikita Karetnikov's message of
	"Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:49:31 -0500")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org> skribis:

>> You could run =E2=80=98nix-build -A stdenv -K /path/to/nixpkgs=E2=80=99.=
  Upon glibc
>> build failure, just get into the failed build tree:
>
> Yep, it failed with the same error.

Then there may be something wrong with your setup, because glibc is
known to build on Fuloong, right?  We=E2=80=99d need to compare the derivat=
ion
and output paths with Llu=C3=ADs, but I think you already did that.

> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `subdir_lib'.
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/nix-build-46dkvs7arjnsb0073n603lr7c6r6ws=
kl-glibc-2.13.drv-1/glibc-2.13/catgets'
> building math/subdir_lib
> smake  subdir=3Dmath -C math ..=3D../ subdir_lib
> make[1]: *** [math/subdir_lib] Killed
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/nix-build-46dkvs7arjnsb0073n603lr7c6r6ws=
kl-glibc-2.13.drv-1/glibc-2.13'
> make: *** [all] Error 2

Can you run =E2=80=98strace -f -o log make=E2=80=99 to see exactly what get=
s killed?
(Do that in the build tree after having sourced =E2=80=98env-vars=E2=80=99.)

> I've found some (probably related) links. [1,2]

That seems different: they get an actual compiler error, whereas you get
no error, just =E2=80=9CKilled=E2=80=9D.

Ludo=E2=80=99.