From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org>
Subject: Re: Initial cross-compilation support
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 00:23:26 +0400
Message-ID: <874ndwm69t.fsf@karetnikov.org>
References: <87txoxv7x9.fsf@gnu.org> <201303031726.08488.andreas@enge.fr>
	<8738wcyxs7.fsf@gnu.org> <87wqsrrho3.fsf@karetnikov.org>
	<878v57r6f4.fsf@gnu.org> <87boa38cj8.fsf@karetnikov.org>
	<87y5d7w3j5.fsf@gnu.org> <8738vf6kll.fsf@karetnikov.org>
	<877gkqo7w7.fsf@gnu.org> <87hajtq4xe.fsf@karetnikov.org>
	<87a9plc2cu.fsf@gnu.org> <874nftzwr0.fsf@karetnikov.org>
	<87ehd1qw2z.fsf@gnu.org> <87wqqsdvd9.fsf@karetnikov.org>
	<874ndwhzfy.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36744)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nikita@karetnikov.org>) id 1Uet2x-0001jV-AM
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 16:20:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nikita@karetnikov.org>) id 1Uet2p-0007Xd-Mm
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 16:20:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <874ndwhzfy.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?=
	=?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 21 May 2013 22:04:33 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

--=-=-=

> I was expecting a patch that uses the right triplet and any other tricks
> we discussed so that glibc & co. get built for N64.  Do you have
> anything like that?

Well, I'm trying the diff from this message [1] now.

[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2013-03/msg00154.html

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=JbBM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--