From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Font package naming convention
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:09:15 +0300
Message-ID: <874mtul55w.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87ioj1sccx.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87ppd9e6ah.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20141030191743.GB19999@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr>
	<878ujxdxmj.fsf@gmail.com> <20141031175840.GA16902@debian>
	<87sii4q64v.fsf@gnu.org> <20141101095205.GB30939@debian>
	<87ioixo71g.fsf@gnu.org> <20141102174935.GF6865@debian>
	<87d294u0la.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20141103093001.GB7644@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr>
	<87r3wz1s4k.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39915)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1XrLrr-0006xn-Fu
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 02:09:36 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1XrLri-0003ul-Gd
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 02:09:27 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87r3wz1s4k.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:01:15 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2014-11-19 12:01 +0300) wrote:

> I think there were a couple of packages submitted, notably the
> Liberation font.
>
> What about resubmitting them following the agreed-upon naming
> convention, Alex?

Sure, I'm just waiting for the existing packages to be updated, because
I don't fully understand how the liberation package should be named now.
=E2=80=9Cfont-liberation=E2=80=9D?

> Andreas, could you take a look at updating the guidelines?  Do you want
> to handle the rename of existing font packages as well?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.

--=20
Alex