From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#20025: user in ratpoison doesn't have access to guix by default Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:36:40 +0100 Message-ID: <874mptni5j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150307000931.GB1292@venom> <878uf7nnue.fsf@gnu.org> <20150310115301.GF16813@crashnator.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVJPF-0000Mp-FK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:37:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVJPE-0004Hv-5a for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:37:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVJPE-0004Hh-3M for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:37:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVJPD-0002wk-QV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:37:03 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20150310115301.GF16813@crashnator.suse.cz> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Cech?="'s message of "Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:53:01 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Cech?= Cc: 20025-done@debbugs.gnu.org Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech skribis: > On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 11:09:13PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>tcech@suse.cz skribis: >> >>> After booting into Guix I used slim to login into Ratpoison and I run >>> there terminal emulator. `guix' wasn't available in current PATH >>> settings so user couldn't maintain his profile. >>> >>> I believe that /run/current-system/profile/bin/ should be added to PATH. >> >>AFAICS it is. >> >>Could it be that the account=E2=80=99s .bash_profile fails to source >>/etc/profile, or something like that (info "(bash) Bash Startup Files")? >>See /etc/skel/.bash{rc,_profile} as examples. > > As my config file changed, I'm no longer able to reproduce it. If there is > such bug, it will reappear in future. > > Please close the bug. Thanks. Ludo'.