From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add lpsolve. Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 21:35:54 +0200 Message-ID: <874mn9n0f9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150516191026.GA6149@debian> <87twvbj73v.fsf@gnu.org> <20150518111229.GA4636@debian.bordeaux.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48023) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuQpX-0001lg-KD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 15:36:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuQpR-0006rD-KB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 15:36:03 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuQpR-0006r8-Hd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 15:35:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150518111229.GA4636@debian.bordeaux.inria.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of "Mon, 18 May 2015 13:12:29 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:12:52PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: [...] >> > + (license license:lgpl2.1))) >> LGPLv2.1-only? > > Well, I do not quite know where I took this from any more. The distributi= on > says: > "free (see LGPL for the GNU lesser general public license)" > and refers to LGPL.txt, which is not contained in the tarball, however. > The sourceforge website states > "License GNU Library or Lesser General Public License version 2.0 (LGPLv2= )". > > By calling it "lesser" and not "library", they must mean 2.1 at least. > As there are no further specifications, I suppose this means 2.1+? I think so, yes. > I also realised I forgot to install the header files. There are quite a > few .h files after unpacking the tarball; I will try to track those that > are used by the demo program also included. Yeah, these may be useful. ;-) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.