From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: 02/02: gnu: camlp4: Remove extra input. Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:36:52 +0200 Message-ID: <874mi25sbf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20151007182229.7660.43511@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46794) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjvSN-00060A-Pl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 16:37:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjvSN-0000XI-0X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 16:36:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Efraim Flashner's message of "Wed, 07 Oct 2015 18:22:30 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Efraim Flashner skribis: > commit d04efa0fff908de0f8822a27582b4b1c3dcae553 > Author: Efraim Flashner > Date: Wed Oct 7 14:44:59 2015 +0300 > > gnu: camlp4: Remove extra input. >=20=20=20=20=20 > * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (camlp4)[inputs]: Removed duplicate "ocaml" > entry from native-inputs. > --- > gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 3 +-- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm > index fc45805..0302c85 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm > @@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ Git-friendly development workflow.") > "0icdfzhsbgf89925gc8gl3fm8z2xzszzlib0v9dj5wyzkyv3a342")) > (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz")))) > (build-system gnu-build-system) > - (native-inputs `(("ocaml" ,ocaml) > - ("which" ,which))) > + (native-inputs `(("which" ,which))) > (inputs `(("ocaml" ,ocaml))) This was probably correct: When cross-compiling, you would both need the compiler (in =E2=80=98native-inputs=E2=80=99) and the run-time support libr= ary (thus in =E2=80=98inputs=E2=80=99.) Now, this is mostly theoretical in this case because it would probably take more than this to cross-compile OCaml code. Ludo=E2=80=99.