From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: Plan for 0.9.0 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:28:22 +0200 Message-ID: <874mhsiae1.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <87io6b943m.fsf@gnu.org> <878u75ql2q.fsf@gnu.org> <87eggxfc5o.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87k2qpp1ko.fsf@gnu.org> <20151014170227.3a293b5a@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51081) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmheA-0004DQ-9y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:28:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmhe6-0001OP-Gj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:28:38 -0400 Received: from smtp24.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.58]:51802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmhe6-0001Nn-8a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:28:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20151014170227.3a293b5a@openmailbox.org> (Eric Bavier's message of "Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:02:27 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Bavier Cc: guix-devel Eric Bavier writes: > On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:44:39 +0200 > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > >> Mathieu Lirzin skribis: >>=20 >> > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> > >> >> Dunno, I admit I=E2=80=99m not as enthusiastic as the other people he= re. :-) >> >> >> >> What would =E2=80=98guix gc=E2=80=99 (without any option) do? >> > >> > Show --help and exit(0)? ;) >>=20 >> Sure we could do that, but I=E2=80=99m not convinced it=E2=80=99s an imp= rovement. WDYT? > > FWIW, I'm not convinced either. I think the enthusiasm for changing =E2=80=98guix gc=E2=80=99 was induced b= y somekind of shared experience of typing it loosely and ending up having to download a lot of substitutes again. So maybe we can keep =E2=80=98guix gc=E2=80=99= as it is but make it interactive by listing what is going to be deleted and ask for confirmation with a [Y/n] prompt. This solution will also require somekind of a =E2=80=98--force=E2=80=99 option for scripting purposes. Does it sound better? -- Mathieu Lirzin