From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: zita-convolver: Drop the '-march=native'
	optimization.
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 22:13:55 +0100
Message-ID: <874meq5s30.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <1452095330-14147-1-git-send-email-iyzsong@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40857)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aGvPB-0005Cy-Sg
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:14:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aGvP8-00088D-MU
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:14:05 -0500
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:25926)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aGvP8-000880-DY
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:14:02 -0500
In-reply-to: <1452095330-14147-1-git-send-email-iyzsong@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= <iyzsong@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


> +              (snippet
> +               ;; Don't optimize for a specific processor architecture.
> +               '(substitute* "libs/Makefile"
> +                  (("^CXXFLAGS \\+= -march=native") "")))
> +              (modules '((guix build utils)))

Is this to avoid that packages are optimised for the CPU of the build
slave?  If so, could we instead pass different optimisation flags for
different architectures?  For a convolver I’d prefer to have *some*
optimisation, even if it’s just the greatest common divisor.

~~ Ricardo