From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: myglc2 Subject: bug#22607: doc install from *Guix Package Info: profile* fails Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:36:27 -0500 Message-ID: <874mdg5s5w.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87si116d8j.fsf@gmail.com> <8760xxbu1j.fsf@gmail.com> <87oabp5qk0.fsf@gmail.com> <87lh6s6fee.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36813) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTZcU-0003Ve-JS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:36:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTZcQ-00042E-IV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:36:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTZcQ-000426-Fq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:36:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTZcQ-00070J-Av for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:36:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87lh6s6fee.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:14:33 +0300") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: 22607@debbugs.gnu.org Alex Kost writes: [...] > After all I see why you were confused. Emacs interface has always been > aimed only for a user profile. "M-x guix-system-generations" was added > very recently just to show what systems you have and what global > packages they contain, and by accident you can perform the same actions on > these system packages as with user profile. > > I'm going to remove this false possibility (I mean, a user shouldn't get > a chance to install anything to a system profile) to avoid future > confusions. Thanks for reporting! Sound great! Thank you. > (Sorry for not answering to the rest of your message, you write the big > ones :-)) np, I will work on being concise