From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add gdk-pixbuf+svg. Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:31:32 +0800 Message-ID: <874mc85bpn.fsf@member.fsf.org> References: <1457959093-5504-1-git-send-email-iyzsong@gmail.com> <20160314203858.GA8309@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42671) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aflKX-0001dx-8t for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 05:31:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aflKS-0006qX-9h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 05:31:57 -0400 Received: from smtp8.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.42]:50971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aflKS-0006qM-4A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 05:31:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160314203858.GA8309@solar> (Andreas Enge's message of "Mon, 14 Mar 2016 21:38:58 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge writes: > Hello, > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:38:12PM +0800, =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 wro= te: >> * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (gdk-pixbuf+svg): New variable. > > does it need to be a variable, or would it not make more sense to simply > modify gdk-pixbuf? gdk-pixbuf+svg depends on librsvg, while librsvg depends on gdk-pixbuf, so I think there must be two version. and the closure size of gdk-pixbuf+svg is 210MB while gdk-pixbuf has 116MB, so I think we should using the large one only when necessary.