From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add rottlog.
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 15:51:18 +0200
Message-ID: <874m8p1e3t.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87lh23andj.fsf@gnu.org> <20160617183936.GA11491@jasmine>
	<87h9crabtk.fsf@gnu.org> <20160618015038.GB1823@jasmine>
	<87d1neak2e.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54453)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bEd8V-0006le-Ui
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 09:51:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bEd8M-0005MI-EK
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 09:51:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87d1neak2e.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Sat, 18
	Jun 2016 12:05:29 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:

> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:51:19PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add rottlog.
>>
>> Silly me! I just noticed that we already have this packaged in (gnu
>> packages admin). Can you take a look and see if it meets your needs, or
>> if it needs some changes?
>
> Silly you?  Silly me!  Sorry, I must have misunderstood civodul,
> it already looks better, now to see how to hook it up.

Apologies if I spread confusion!

Basically Rottlog is already packaged but when I tried running it, it
would fail in obscure ways (I never really investigated, though).

As for mcron, I have plans to push a reworked versioned of the patch I
posted earlier Real Soon Now.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.