From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: st: Mov to terminals.scm.
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 23:28:22 +0200
Message-ID: <874m6vc5mx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <871t20ahcb.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87y44892ku.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87r39zmldt.fsf@member.fsf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46830)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>) id 1bWs64-0001z9-0p
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:28:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>) id 1bWs5z-0001q4-3N
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:28:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87r39zmldt.fsf@member.fsf.org> (=?utf-8?B?IuWui+aWh+atpiIn?=
	=?utf-8?B?cw==?= message of "Mon, 08 Aug 2016 21:38:06 +0800")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= <iyzsong@member.fsf.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6) writes:

> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think it's pointless to have a suckless.scm which bundles all software
>> which just happens to follow suckless ideology/goals or be hosted
>> there.
>> That's why I did not commit ii to suckless but to irc.scm, no one will
>> look into suckless.scm when what they really are looking for is not
>> $suckless but application xy.
>> I try to unbundle and remove suckless.scm with the next patches.
>
> Well, it's difficult to choose the "right" category for packages.
> For example, 'dmenu' shouldn't go to 'wm.scm', it has nothing to
> do with window managers.
>
> When a project makes multiple softwares, I think it's easier to
> put all of them in one project file, eg: gnome and freedesktop.

So you are in favour of keeping (gnu packages suckless)?

--=20
Mathieu Lirzin