From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix ldc. Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:39:18 +0200 Message-ID: <874m631t5l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160803095110.3e5cf1bc@scratchpost.org> <20160803092015.8541-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20160808190611.33e652df@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40277) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1beOem-0005jY-Ir for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:39:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1beOef-0003fY-NE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:39:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160808190611.33e652df@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:06:11 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi! Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > Any news on this? Sorry to ask this, but could you resend them with =E2=80=98git send-email= =E2=80=99, but without making the actual patch an attachment? Somehow I=E2=80=99m failing= to apply them in their current form. :-/ > Meanwhile, I have a new patch to provide ldc-1.1.0-beta2. What should I d= o with it? Make a new patch series and refer to this one as prerequisite?=20 In general we do not provide betas, so this patch series is probably still OK. Ludo=E2=80=99.