From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add dbacl. Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:25:15 -0400 Message-ID: <874m41u8ms.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <20161016230028.2666-1-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bygBv-000215-LU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:25:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bygBr-0004NM-6R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:25:31 -0400 Received: from smtp25.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.59]:42824 helo=smtp10.openmailbox.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bygBr-0004Mj-1q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:25:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20161016230028.2666-1-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> (ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is's message of "Sun, 16 Oct 2016 23:00:27 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org ng0 writes: > [PATCH] gnu: Add dbacl. > > Since the discussion we had about 2 weeks ago, I decided to just > remove the last occurence of the dbacl-jap.* this way it builds and > tests succeed. > > Why have I packaged this? Maybe it was needed for "afew", I'm really > not sure. The checkout is called guix-afew, the branch was 3 months > behind.