From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] file-systems: Suppress fsck status completion bar.
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 10:40:23 +0100
Message-ID: <874m223nco.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
References: <20161105125511.29383-1-mbakke@fastmail.com>
	<20161105125511.29383-4-mbakke@fastmail.com>
	<87r36owaap.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87y40w88g9.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<8760nzy8bj.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87mvhb8wpn.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20161107111509.519536fc@scratchpost.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37000)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1cIBTk-0008OW-3Z
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 04:40:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1cIBTh-0007hb-2Y
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 04:40:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20161107111509.519536fc@scratchpost.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> why not just use "fsck -t xxx" instead? It will filter out "-C" for
> fscks which don't support it.

I think pending a proper solution for handling fsck commands, offloading
it to util-linux is a decent compromise. Ludo, WDYT?

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlhVCAcACgkQoqBt8qM6
VPqiFggAxUmQEHg8KyzoKc53tQQKhxI7nfmMX5QsCnVy5Wac5v9AxqYIXVTeT2vp
mPxvEirsFMfO/j1cQuAAvX3X6XkB2irprMI/27OYx6wgMW2bYIBcYm52Yr88TCRJ
r/ikZTZtueDLNu+E4BF+trXjcPk3ZYkjnDYgZ0NKg5aZtuh6Uos93UXPu7IRbBmY
+fMMvcYCCb+hiYqwOtcXIrIHmSTVmQxfWTQ2mYYPDUhVf2GIqkllc7LjnH2Xfm78
e97Ckcn98613fex2Vw0T8W+txhX3/wW6DcC9/S8SdW81ARX1FYyyTTCbWCA0Fj3Z
AEMUnORcD2CyB3qBabdIcy6df6PiOA==
=nBO6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--