From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csxcz-0006Wu-Dc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:22:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csxcw-0000yT-7H for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:22:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csxcw-0000yN-3u for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:22:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1csxcv-0005co-RB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:22:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26248: Should we recompile Vala code in LXDE? Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20170325002448.ghzfxtyix4vzhukz@abyayala> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:21:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170325002448.ghzfxtyix4vzhukz@abyayala> (ng0's message of "Sat, 25 Mar 2017 00:24:48 +0000") Message-ID: <874lydtanf.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 26248@debbugs.gnu.org Oh, another comment: some of the packages, such as lxsession, contain C code generated from Vala (the tarball contains both the Vala source and the generated C code.) I don=E2=80=99t think there=E2=80=99s a precedent (?), but we may want to r= emove the generated code and rebuild it from source. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99.