From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuSJR-0005t1-Nj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:20:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuSJO-0000rO-J3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:20:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuSJO-0000rC-FA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:20:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuSJO-0008Lk-AV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:20:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26222: [PATCH] gnu: freedoom: Avoid the need to propagate prboom-plus. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Kei Kebreau References: <20170323023539.23855-1-kei@openmailbox.org> <877f3f6fzb.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87poh72xzo.fsf@openmailbox.org> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:19:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87poh72xzo.fsf@openmailbox.org> (Kei Kebreau's message of "Thu, 23 Mar 2017 22:46:03 -0400") Message-ID: <874ly767i9.fsf@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 26222-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kei Kebreau writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Kei Kebreau writes: >> >> From reading the "dist/freedoom" shell script, it looks like it tries >> prboom-plus automatically if it exists in PATH. Does this not work? It >> also tries a bunch of other engines, so I don't think we should hard >> code one. >> > > In that case, we could instead leave the package as is and have users > install prboom-plus (or future engines when they are packaged) > manually. Freedoom's package description already mentions that it needs > a compatible engine to run. If you think that's enough for a casual user > to notice, I'm fine with dropping the patch. > I've decided against this patch, as we may have other Doom engines available in the future. Thank you for your time, Marius. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAljgNX8ACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg1Z0Q//bN0GXF7iyG5fsNOO6kOzPp2583VsTSIlteYOieDhYBS8xUXDEjCgEV83 eArEjVFu6rBrEiomjMck3UpWREyLKIuy41LWCy8opIIlpsPhd84unvt8tpxYCaUb r+juXcAwNlAQI7V01OaWf5DG68hPyJDSa8TV7slqxQAnn85TmlQjqitb6Pr+wfni +DHfbhjc8bkIz2eaZdbdjFMYld+BIzQx3ZMRc8VlQ1/rbhXrP1HuhT9FUm49/KOX xcMp1b2ONmHj91l6Mgr6XHrsgzex+3mjseBQrSlA7bbj3IBh2SLmDe6Bqlqp1m13 ZMzqNwYor9PWzII94Ils9JUq/FYgptoYjwAy8ENj0w8SUb3y2YIbl3g/Cg11TeSH qxxh2bon8U4IfUuwUjjySIjZKWpP73cWFaqVq0yagnwcKpgywRIk3T+8mNzAhigT 8OypxZDioHTwxibjJ76/ph39V8Wz4M07eZDCYmb62XvLoH4+bpc8hvn0+OX6y4Zf em89zaY7HShf3ZKZsTV9vf49xfG9+HVv28jyP6JbV7aNJaLYBVUNgtVyrXo30vWe xuqCc7Ur8UlDous80Xs5iGrmFyJ7A159fi8yDnep0eWciptmxrKNaLM650bsZXlh fSOdkS1cF88dNQHzXhDmn2byreC9ImcCLPlhAJHu0en6tS0g4iA= =1s1O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--