From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxVyW-0008QW-34 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:51:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxVyR-0007WH-L2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:51:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42388) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxVyR-0007Vv-HK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:51:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cxVyR-0000zp-9o for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:51:03 -0400 Subject: bug#26374: [PATCH] gnu: Move dillo to web.scm. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20170405191411.32328-1-kei@openmailbox.org> <87lgreabjk.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87zifu2z34.fsf@openmailbox.org> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:50:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zifu2z34.fsf@openmailbox.org> (Kei Kebreau's message of "Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:50:55 -0400") Message-ID: <874lxwfv6x.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: 26374@debbugs.gnu.org Kei Kebreau skribis: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Kei Kebreau writes: >> >>> * gnu/packages/dillo.scm: Remove file and move dillo... >>> * gnu/packages/web.scm: ...here. >>> * gnu/local.mk: Remove reference to removed file. >> >> I think it would be good to have a "web-browsers.scm" to try and keep >> things organized; web.scm is already a kind of "kitchen sink" for >> anything web related. What do others think? >> >> There are a few other modules that could be moved into a >> web-browsers.scm as well. > > Splitting web.scm into more specific parts could be useful IMO. Introducing web-browsers.scm for a start sounds good to me. Ludo=E2=80=99.