From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: bug#26346: [PATCH] asdf-build-system improvements.
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 15:19:04 +0200
Message-ID: <874lwl548n.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <20170403003732.1c3b8afb@uwaterloo.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56668)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1dAcNj-0000VH-4z
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 09:19:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1dAcNg-0005AK-1C
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 09:19:19 -0400
Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21023)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1dAcNf-0005AA-QI
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 09:19:15 -0400
In-reply-to: <20170403003732.1c3b8afb@uwaterloo.ca>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Andy Patterson <ajpatter@uwaterloo.ca>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 26346-done@debbugs.gnu.org


Hi Andy,

> As promised a long time ago, I'm attaching patches to improve the state
> of the asdf-build-system.

I will push your patches with some very minor changes (e.g. fixed
typos, slightly adjusted commit summaries) after confirming that stumpwm
still works fine.

Thank you for your patches and your patience!

> As a result, there will be some changes that
> users should be aware of. Users of stumpwm should include sbcl-stumpwm
> as opposed to (list sbcl-stumpwm "bin") in their OS configurations, or
> sbcl-stumpwm instead of sbcl-stumpwm:bin in their profiles.

@guix-devel: please note this change and make adjustments to your
manifests or OS configurations if you’re using StumpWM.

-- 
Ricardo

GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net