From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34786) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS3KV-0005x7-Kk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 11:32:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS3KU-0005Jg-T2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 11:32:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS3KU-0005JW-Q4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 11:32:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS3KU-0002tu-LZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 11:32:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27521] [PATCH] guix system: Add "--file-system-type" option. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <878tk6rmvo.fsf@gnu.org> <20170703103407.18974-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <87van9pwcn.fsf@gnu.org> <20170703151423.7d383eb5@scratchpost.org> <878tk5ppu7.fsf@gnu.org> <20170703162027.74b700b0@scratchpost.org> Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:31:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170703162027.74b700b0@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Mon, 3 Jul 2017 16:20:27 +0200") Message-ID: <874lutpme3.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 27521@debbugs.gnu.org Danny Milosavljevic skribis: >> Right, so how do you suggest that we expose qcow2 vs. raw? > > $ guix system vm-image config.scm # qcow2 > > vs > > $ guix system disk-image config.scm # raw > > I don't know whether there are other differences. > If there are any then it maybe makes sense to go further... OK, sounds good! Ludo'.