From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#27862: tor-hidden-service should support IPv6 Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:03:43 +0200 Message-ID: <874lqtvmao.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170728154652.tgigkve7n5wzdrlc@abyayala> <87a83hsjws.fsf@gnu.org> <20170802224505.coaewqkh7p5dqhum@abyayala> <87y3qzov6p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45439) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5ZmQ-0002NC-Li for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:04:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5ZmM-00067T-0R for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:04:14 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43884) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5ZmL-00067G-Tm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:04:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e5ZmE-00087Q-FR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:04:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87y3qzov6p.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 04 Aug 2017 23:54:38 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 27862@debbugs.gnu.org ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > ng0 skribis: > >> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s transcribed 0.4K bytes: >>> ng0 skribis: >>>=20 >>> > Right now the tor-hidden-service only supports IPv4 naming scheme, >>> > while it is possible to define IPv6 for tor aswell. >>>=20 >>> =E2=80=98tor-hidden-service=E2=80=99 does not interpret addresses. So = one could write, >>> say: >>>=20 >>> (80 . "[::1]:80") >> >> Oh. Okay, I did not even try it because I live on the dark side of IPv6 = ;) >> Then all which needs to be done is a small extension of the documentation >> of tor-hidden-service. > > Patch welcome. :-) I=E2=80=99m still interested in the doc patch :-), but I=E2=80=99m closing = the bug because it was not an actual bug, AIUI. Ludo=E2=80=99.