From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56314) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7qXO-0003Bs-78 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:22:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7qXL-0001wO-1V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:22:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55203) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7qXK-0001vz-LO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:22:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7qXK-0000lc-D8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:22:02 -0400 Subject: bug#29016: [PATCH] gnu: video: Add ffmpeg@3.3. (fixes for ffmpeg 3.4) Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <7a931bb723db2d28b856c6d5a8788cc5@mykolab.com> References: <7a931bb723db2d28b856c6d5a8788cc5@mykolab.com> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:21:19 +0200 Message-ID: <874lqlzh28.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Rutger Helling , 29016-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rutger Helling writes: > Hey Guix,=20 > > I've noticed a few packages unfortunately break with ffmpeg 3.4. This > patch adds ffmpeg 3.3.4 back and changes the inputs of these broken > packages to ffmpeg@3.3. Thanks! I tweaked the commit message to reflect the actual variable names and added a followup commit to update ffmpeg@3.3 to 3.3.5 which was released today. Currently qemu and other gst-libav dependents may end up with two different versions of ffmpeg in their closure, which is not great. But these two packages only have 10 dependents, so I guess it's okay. Pushed as b1c01503dfcb915c39af4a45716ebafafb806549. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlnyX98ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpeSAgAoUoy5C0d/iLhQ7ocxfQobwDjMBFE3IOXwjKa1ZzS9q2/LiZ7Fx/B+bfR opfiy2O4NCB/nhXHDn9wWxvI9sxLjRU8orqOpmjFrpkgCMdpSY5UVrGNb1pZtbWP QDVZ9E28FS5qEEORE5Uce24DzLT/o+oYpc7ELQ1rzQmFFKXNFu0VVXqD3KzDPlFS PcH+t46KDsWSA2Yq/7az3e+3ttMxe/2NucYHLaVR4iSphkyveN/cBJa2cMoVbHtk DnxN3gaN+b8hlEZt6xfVDbuquxoN+UIlsjHVTsJWhynEZ82Rj6XIQTuy4ZKMiL0E rQyAhrFyXzmk1Zf7OiZ5LkWwX7xQ6Q== =o9qY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--