From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Cuirass news
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:18:56 +0100
Message-ID: <874lmpw0rj.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <877es6x5xj.fsf@gnu.org> <87lggmjjgo.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87k1w6jjak.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8raxeym.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20180126153005.259a75e8@scratchpost.org> <87zi4z1eb0.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20180127181852.42f0bcbf@scratchpost.org> <87fu6bwqix.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20180208172905.19e9e789@scratchpost.org> <871shvt94p.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20180209000526.5b9ea8e7@scratchpost.org> <87wozm4i12.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20180209122931.5a47e63e@scratchpost.org> <877ermyuj2.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20180209180608.79fb856b@scratchpost.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50398)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ekTBX-0003nz-0l
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 06:19:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ekTBT-0004uZ-Nf
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 06:19:10 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:47992)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ekTBT-0004t7-Cb
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 06:19:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20180209180608.79fb856b@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's
	message of "Fri, 9 Feb 2018 18:06:08 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Hi Danny,

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:

> the patch LGTM!

Pushed!

>>I=E2=80=99d reluctant to =E2=80=98sqlite-uncache!=E2=80=99 though.
>
> I was thinking if you are in the REPL and actually want it to forget the
> statement which you cached before, it would be good to be able to do that.
> I wonder what I was thinking that was good for, though.
>
> User can always just close the database connection.

Yeah.  :-)

Now I have another problem: with
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-cuirass.git/commit/?id=3Dc47df=
df82b4be62501a7932eaec4c124566a1829>
HTTP requests are now processed concurrently for real.  But that brings
its own set of problems, in particular the fact that <sqlite-db> access
is not thread-safe, as discussed earlier.

Thinking about it, it wouldn=E2=80=99t matter that HTTP requests are proces=
sed
sequentially if database queries run really fast.  I=E2=80=99m not sure if =
we
can achieve it.  WDYT?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.

PS: I=E2=80=99ll be away for the next few days.