From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <ambrevar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: chromaprint: fpcalc missing
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 20:03:42 +0530
Message-ID: <874lkspdfd.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87d0zgdcyf.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAJ98PDxbuT2EVwuEaHEhCDkKDYAnhcT8nkK8nvckvsS2Obc2GA@mail.gmail.com>
	<876058wlik.fsf@gmail.com> <87in989ze9.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44488)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ambrevar@gmail.com>) id 1f3N0S-0004rW-7j
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:33:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ambrevar@gmail.com>) id 1f3N0N-0005i8-G1
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:33:52 -0400
In-reply-to: <87in989ze9.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: help-guix <help-guix@gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> The best way to know that is by sending a patch.  ;-)
>
> A common criterion in deciding whether or not to enable an optional
> feature is how widely used it is vs. how much it adds to the size of the
> package closure.  If you can provide that kind of info in your patch
> submission, that=E2=80=99ll make it easier to decide what to do.

Done: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D31046

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlrDkMYACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH/iNwgAkGb+JjyEAmac9g8Tb2Tyx68vsb7ryW2MD9RBph8GtEa1aOkXRbdWzP76
4hJTQgCK3cp/kxvgzPDU6TcJW1IKsCW2pwrC6obajEWOCM8pzXbOaXdgbh69hoot
XDJf6TG86KIe8Ovis8o/BJCk7fD63YLlfXvqKiY5scfIlWwiwqz0YIGJcIeb4NY5
fEtRUOLxslfkmUcbYIfWsQwLtfE4naDHqLIGTO5pWLzgz6IdoOQF97H5Th1c3LDN
xr5WquZBGDtSbAHmHiue5DGVdDQK4lLt53lw8B9ubQhdXE/+2BO7mdWmrEp2mQsU
vydbLX2IWankf7JwpmggblWBgd0TpQ==
=sK4n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--