From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on
	armhf.
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 23:28:14 +0200
Message-ID: <874lhgggb5.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20180702101757.22792.51026@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20180702101758.97A6020543@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<8736x1r1g0.fsf@netris.org> <874lhhwkz7.fsf@fastmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48753)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1faSqP-0006DA-SE
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 17:28:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1faSqO-0001Nb-Td
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 17:28:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <874lhhwkz7.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Mon, 02
	Jul 2018 20:28:28 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:

> I'm sorry, I forgot to address your actual concerns.  The (buggy)
> workaround was put in place and discussed in
> <https://bugs.gnu.org/30761>.  The meat of it can be found in (guix
> build-system meson):
>
>     ;; XXX PatchELF fails to build on armhf, so we skip
>     ;; the 'fix-runpath' phase there for now.  It is used
>     ;; to avoid superfluous entries in RUNPATH as described
>     ;; in <https://bugs.gnu.org/28444#46>, so armhf may now
>     ;; have different runtime dependencies from other arches.
>
> Now, I'm not proud of this "workaround", but it's not exactly new, so I
> don't see why we should rush to fix it now.  Given how late we are in
> this staging cycle, I would prefer delaying any proper fix until the
> next round.

I agree.  It=E2=80=99s terrible, but the priority here is to get =E2=80=98s=
taging=E2=80=99 in
shape for merging.

Thanks for taking care of =E2=80=98staging=E2=80=99!

Ludo=E2=80=99.