From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52003) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g0UFp-0000a6-NT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 12:14:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g0UFn-0005Qw-Re for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 12:14:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g0UFm-0005QH-HQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 12:14:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g0UFm-0001SQ-Cm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 12:14:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#32547] [PATCH] hydra: Add support for manifests. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20180827222333.7722-1-clement@lassieur.org> <8736udre1x.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhwlahfc.fsf@lassieur.org> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 18:12:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zhwlahfc.fsf@lassieur.org> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur"'s message of "Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:13:43 +0200") Message-ID: <874letpe9m.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: 32547@debbugs.gnu.org Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Hi Cl=C3=A9ment, >> >> Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: >> >>> * build-aux/hydra/gnu-system.scm (arguments->manifests, manifests->pack= ages): >>> New procedures. >>> (hydra-jobs): Add a "manifests" subset. >>> * doc/guix.texi (Continuous Integration): Update accordingly. >> >> Thanks for pushing the patch, and sorry for not commenting earlier! I >> agree this can be very useful. >> >> I=E2=80=99m slightly concerned about the complexity of this file. Maybe >> sometime down the road we could split it in several proper modules, like >> (guix ci jobs) that would provide procedures to define =E2=80=9Cpackage = jobs=E2=80=9D, >> =E2=80=9Ccross-compilation jobs=E2=80=9D, and =E2=80=9CVM jobs=E2=80=9D. > > Yes, I agree! And "test jobs" maybe? Indeed. Well, food for thought! Ludo=E2=80=99.