From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: Re: CDN performance
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 20:40:55 -0500
Message-ID: <874lbfd0sd.fsf@netris.org>
References: <20181203154335.10366-1-ludo@gnu.org> <87tvju6145.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87ftv7l6gy.fsf@gmail.com> <871s6qzo6m.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
	<87y38tx365.fsf@gmail.com> <878t0thfp9.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52364)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1gXyxt-0003jw-3l
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 20:42:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1gXyxq-0007Xl-0J
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 20:42:01 -0500
In-Reply-To: <878t0thfp9.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> (Giovanni Biscuolo's
	message of "Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:41:06 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Giovanni Biscuolo <g@xelera.eu>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 33600@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Giovanni,

Giovanni Biscuolo <g@xelera.eu> writes:
> with a solid infrastructure of "scientifically" trustable build farms,
> there are no reasons not to trust substitutes servers (this implies
> working towards 100% reproducibility of GuixSD)

What does "scientifically trustable" mean?

      Mark