From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59397)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ggmve-0003K3-A8
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 03:40:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ggmvc-0005Dt-L1
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 03:40:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49926)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ggmvc-0005Bd-EE
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 03:40:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ggmva-00017U-7L
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 03:40:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and
	emacs-clang-rename
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33598.B33598.15469367544244@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <ddb74c8a-b135-1edb-a09e-dca07823c0a8@yahoo.de>
	<871s6l9h54.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2ekea1u.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<04daca2a-705d-6255-85bd-48132879f5a8@yahoo.de>
	<87lg4se6wf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<8d15b1a4-5f0b-28aa-a3d9-78520431b8ef@yahoo.de>
	<87imzwe2d3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<2df7cbf3-81d5-7d50-35d7-f3b369d1ac0e@yahoo.de>
	<87ftuth0d7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<14de0933-fddc-94d0-d75a-cdf4b49fce1a@yahoo.de>
	<87wonhipbw.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<792d34a0-b048-b84f-b7b8-d9d996da2a28@yahoo.de>
	<878szwinp0.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <877efgin3x.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<875zv0imr7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k1jgce5s.fsf@gnu.org>
	<878szw6rot.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 09:39:09 +0100
In-Reply-To: <878szw6rot.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of
	"Mon, 07 Jan 2019 23:14:42 +0100")
Message-ID: <874laj35n6.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: Tim Gesthuizen <tim.gesthuizen@yahoo.de>, 33598@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi,

Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> skribis:

> It works, but it's semantically dubious.  For packages like emacs-cmake-m=
ode now
> have to use the llvm module to use package-elisp-from-package.
> Thoughts?

Sure, it probably belongs elsewhere.  I moved it there to quickly fix
the problem, and I purposefully made it private, but I agree, it could
go to some other places if there=E2=80=99s a need for it outside of llvm.sc=
m.
I=E2=80=99m not sure exactly where.

I wonder how often the approach of =E2=80=98package-elisp-from-package=E2=
=80=99 is
applicable or desirable.  There are packages (e.g., recutils, GLOBAL)
that come with elisp files, which automatically get installed upon =E2=80=
=9Cmake
install.=E2=80=9D  I=E2=80=99m not sure we=E2=80=99d want to make them sepa=
rate.

Thoughts?

Ludo=E2=80=99.