From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Using openjdk9 as the default JDK Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 10:08:27 +0100 Message-ID: <874l8hwuwk.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38479) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h164I-0004MP-5Z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 04:08:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h164F-0006Ob-Hk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 04:08:58 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h164E-0006Lw-QI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 04:08:55 -0500 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Guix, there are a few packages now that require Java 9, such as java-eclipse-jdt-compiler-apt (that I=E2=80=99m currently packaging). We should aim to use openjdk9 as the default JDK. What do you think? -- Ricardo