From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41209) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iH2Bz-0004MA-Jt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 04:47:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iH2By-0003BV-Ii for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 04:47:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iH2By-0003BQ-GD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 04:47:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iH2By-0005TL-Cl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 04:47:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#37553] [PATCH] inferior: Change to use the (guix repl) module. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20190929130128.18484-1-mail@cbaines.net> <20190929155728.27777-1-mail@cbaines.net> <87blv0sv2y.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv8sp8qn.fsf@cbaines.net> <87imp7jy01.fsf@gnu.org> From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <87imp7jy01.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 09:46:27 +0100 Message-ID: <874l0mp8gs.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 37553-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Christopher Baines skribis: > >> Yep, I've been experimenting with loading older revisions in to the Guix >> Data Service, and this is one of the issues I came across. > > Nice! I=E2=80=99ve been thinking we should have time-traveling continuous > integration. Like checking that we can build some Guix revision of the > past in between two =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 merges. > > It would also be useful to flag known-bad revisions, but in a way the > Data Service is already doing that for recent revisions. So I've been looking at retrying failed jobs in the Guix Data Service, there are a few where it's just networking issues talking to Savannah. I guess it could be useful to have a list of revisions which can't be used through guix pull or a channel, and that information could also be used in the Guix Data Service. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl2ZqeNfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XcVOhAAoas3ntAK+6MPBDvjYTeIgjBrkJUarpDi7gM8VdBXWXcSqNstv/yHSb4a mWvxaGgZcaCxpRRf4aJ36gzkJUxNNAe0oNmgxg11jR4tCpFUcrXlLibonfrBoquo 23Edrbf4uWSt/E1UEqoIc6NEewLJv9reU/iBQe0bSL2Y4LdKiI8DIiqH7ZwlJ8UH 1KRundvLavJ2mW772p1uwF2vI1/mBE9Orgu8/Y8qJK/GuzG03Ypx3mUKm706i8RP MlY3nx2XgHqxdjvVneah/ChW2XFNgQ2NV4kkpvC6XDYOd1zUGf3MPw3YruOW3c+H WVggb0rDJr5sUdYfmgHoqQHhHD+aGIf/URxtSZA4smvy1H7BOtC1o5MdGqtNPXGF DWa1Kl1gVyp90xoZFu0QHmqrpZfi64YEbElVNpAVjC4kQc3R7RBVQRyqbArCe6gs s+eRG0KS5HsMmFsnzAoN97QEi0nbw2kpBLFL9PbEWrDS4gOB131DSK9/1n+uxdic NNwCelsSNZyOuzBghiSJeeTEvz29OsKIQdwIDNauAkBMtxA24l4dOvjp4eNeofg6 ywOyo+5/a1IbX/ddbOEnZV29JgpUXwcRRCWqlD/oZth3i4UQiBES+27PKu8n69Ar 6UV6+5RPoovvHHrLbaPQbPfHZWtsf84xg4a8S/vNCrmLGs9xq6w= =6Gxi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--