From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id gE6YAvCQYF85PwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:01:20 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id gMpjOO+QYF8xNAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:01:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800EA94053F for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43392 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kI7m2-0002Lo-HP for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:01:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kI7lL-0002IB-0a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:00:35 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:35901) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kI7lB-0006w7-KO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:00:33 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30B0A160060 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:00:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1600164023; bh=wCT6cyjw3LjZ86Maomt+Xptok2Ts0YR1EGyi6stnlb8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=gjijPf/Xd9vhqxTFfYA+ZnHzmSYC4FFzaZXz2UVzj4zULutr4AL69kGIgvK9Zh7Wb dYQWrznycE8PxyXBjeH9NX8zTvfEJVuwODeLZ4f62ffisGnTl60hNAthq2IY7i9Fx2 LOzSTalJaW+oXP8xmiaOWa2R7KkMA/MiP36P+AWbOx0edu7hv+gGr7Ghk5Gti7DFqS lZVYGTdylkOW4cO6wx9xu+ASR+8JXUbrMaDQHJGmNnkhJNtHTK9A2zUUHQGCotlb0w aXLJBgnpqdcEXpS0RhHDrFI7WU+1PkvQ3ctwGvRc2ALR0qfJMeJfqRErVGu/HAJX9c 9kcumgyYP85Ag== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4BrJd116Bhz6tmN; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:00:20 +0200 (CEST) References: <87sgbntjz4.fsf@yamatai> <87blibcmuy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87y2lfb67c.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <875z8jb3lw.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Improve ASDF build system for Common Lisp libraries In-reply-to: <875z8jb3lw.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:00:15 +0200 Message-ID: <874knzqs0g.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=glv@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/15 06:00:23 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Katherine Cox-Buday Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=gjijPf/X; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.51 X-TUID: 4Esi7LOwvxGr --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain To further simplify package definitions, I thought we could remove the need for the 'asd-files' keyword in the package's arguments by just reading all the '.asd' files in the directory tree of the sources. Can you think of a case where this would cause an issue? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCX2CQrw8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j+cnwD+PQvKpxxjoA8hiDpBD+YP6Hvo8rDXiLh60Co3 bYyseSkA/2ea/h7g5cFLo6KkdHvwudTzNWsEbj4csjEjG8V5exgQ =p3Mo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--