From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id ONXvOWekLmANYAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:31:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id iCuyNWekLmBzPgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:31:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A82C930DB9 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:31:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52662 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCn94-0000Du-OT for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:31:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCn4O-00030C-Uu; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:26:28 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCn4N-0000e4-Sd; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:26:27 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=46710 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lCn4N-0003zk-6n; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:26:27 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: Re: Update on wip-arm-bootstrap References: <87blco9v58.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 30 =?utf-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:26:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87blco9v58.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Sat, 13 Feb 2021 10:25:39 +0100") Message-ID: <874ki9qocf.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-mes@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.37 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A82C930DB9 X-Spam-Score: -1.37 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: TiYzEAnqT/sU Hi! I read the story, which I found rather fun and full of suspense, but I admit I was disappointed by the ending. :-) Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > ...pretty familiar. So, what's going on here? Do the "woody" > binaries not run on novena? Does that mean there are no old reference binaries known to work on Novena? Ludo=E2=80=99.