From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms11 with LMTPS
	id ANYtOCx8OmCYJwAA0tVLHw
	(envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:06:52 +0000
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp2 with LMTPS
	id puTiMyx8OmAmPAAAB5/wlQ
	(envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:06:52 +0000
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71CE4288D9
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:06:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:45800 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lG33L-0002f6-I0
	for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:06:51 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53896)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1lG32Z-0002dD-Qm
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:06:04 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33708)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1lG32Z-0000wF-Ie
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:06:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lG32Y-0001gz-Et
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:06:02 -0500
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Subject: [bug#46784] [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License.
Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:06:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.46784.B46784.16144455596491@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46784
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: 46784@debbugs.gnu.org, lle-bout@zaclys.net
X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 46784@debbugs.gnu.org, lle-bout@zaclys.net,
 guix-patches@gnu.org
Received: via spool by 46784-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46784.16144455596491
 (code B ref 46784); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:06:02 +0000
Received: (at 46784) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2021 17:05:59 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45253 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1lG32V-0001gd-9h
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:05:59 -0500
Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:38342)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <me@tobias.gr>) id 1lG32T-0001gS-DA
 for 46784@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:05:58 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018;
 bh=cXUaR2jHiOvve8fPGofZ1YsPmUXIehDlfEPWF708iOQ=; h=date:in-reply-to:
 references:subject:cc:to:from; b=ndfRRnSNA8cKu4M83sjMkkm2jyu5iPAAQBE1m
 hC0GRUEbgm96DITKjACDmVDGikwB9WVfayCdtX49kU8iFjibWDma6YZ6OpKQw0HtG7Kc9Y
 UypVSixQJxbIDv8SS1jrrBNJrXx+t778hwymn+xDYM9KdmnN3pG0wohFgm74jYrFSzkugQ
 UdtQTXpKcgVTVHYBxzuaAlrt1aX2d9oe136IUJq6gTowRl1L3Gy3aGgrVxgZXm6f4DOTeM
 sKYub2GDh1yGLECRZHjtA6STKns5kZphm7DRu31s5bUQglaJMnvgFltA3+YblSHdBu4tLO
 DQvBFsTTEd+d13JDqmqCjtFcg==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 35acd449
 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); 
 Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:06:49 +0000 (UTC)
BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default;
References: <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org>
 <9da8d5272386896d150143acc82ae4fb1ca82138.camel@zaclys.net>
 <87r1l1203h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
In-reply-to: <87r1l1203h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:05:54 +0100
Message-ID: <874khx5tl9.fsf@nckx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Reply-to:  Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
X-ACL-Warn: ,  Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches <guix-patches@gnu.org>
From:  Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org;
	s=key1; t=1614445612;
	h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:
	 message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
	 content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender:
	 resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:
	 list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:
	 dkim-signature; bh=cXUaR2jHiOvve8fPGofZ1YsPmUXIehDlfEPWF708iOQ=;
	b=LvXcBvZrj5TJTQlWMZ8ut5XU88ox0bowSZQzdJMQR9s+djNulDtzA8+jmv6O1RjHWPw2xY
	948ytqjacGhYgbTTlIs2jQk04DWk3PLDcsTgvO/k7e6kP6sGs6zo1vib2ILdjtY281/cIq
	5i1u8/xMtiqtYbuUaX4PdUiMM25PDx5Ba4Wj/cdCAkCybpFbOiMdZ0N3prewPGAMxBeOX8
	mHky9/48qU7j4T8KfSYEpU9l1sIHCzXHRXHrVj8HPTzU9ihZsXR6qBpYYSDysIfRmvRbY+
	0Th3pbyeTuQiNxdNglCB01Y7aCGKlwqJE3jyDOd/U3DoNTXLt8AIdcqgw0U4gw==
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1614445612; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none;
	b=tzbu8a/598KgnqdEPpNPuzygRp9EwRUYXmqkkdnY/1ROeeVypAN1lX0KjSvXIgd34+z9+I
	bpCkv7t+SgvYilFjSiLv7AyRwwkTk3sZAelu9GQ1kF7twA8Bm3S8C/F2j6mFLU6U06VHiI
	eYXUEzJGLgEZhcbB0h98kmaOHT5aEnCY0okcSDk/Y7ewh16BzhGcXwkOwOstyzWvOaaYmO
	jvviaQEjZcuFi2gVkQFijONkjbFW2F30z8dap+g7CJTxnQQ6W569gLSHtOXSCiodVnrp61
	apIwwvc3Bvwm6jYBsnRdzLCID5gZa12foIYsVWTHZ/kjGtI5iNaWUtQfkcEXXA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
	aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=ndfRRnSN;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.97
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=ndfRRnSN;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 71CE4288D9
X-Spam-Score: -2.97
X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com
X-TUID: QfQ0HFnrIj85

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Nicolas Goaziou =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> OTOH, bsd-0 is not totally accurate either, because zero-clause=20
> BSD is
> not a BSD derivative. So, here come my nitpick: what about=20
> zero-bsd?

I disagree (disclaimer: I'm the one who suggested =E2=80=98bsd-0=E2=80=99 t=
o Alex=20
:-) that accuracy is implied or valuable.  Guix maps=20
=E2=80=98n-clause-BSD=E2=80=99 to =E2=80=98bsd-n=E2=80=99, we get (marginal=
ly) fewer requests to=20
add =E2=80=98missing=E2=80=99 licences, all is well with the world.

It's true that the 0-clause BSD licence was based on the ISC text;=20
that doesn't make it any less of a BSD licence.  That requires=20
claiming that OpenBSD is not under a BSD licence either, which is=20
a... certain kind of correct.

Kind regards,

T G-R

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYDp78w0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15ZBkBANoH2vNhxjqhX5kOBsxs85RJvu5/Yq2pI8nIqMjX
d1xxAQCofIzCm/ezpjQoyMOOWvjsWrcn8BEn0EVB5tU0Eu2FBA==
=REG/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--