Nicolas Goaziou 写道：
> OTOH, bsd-0 is not totally accurate either, because zero-clause 
> BSD is
> not a BSD derivative. So, here come my nitpick: what about 
> zero-bsd?

I disagree (disclaimer: I'm the one who suggested ‘bsd-0’ to Alex 
:-) that accuracy is implied or valuable.  Guix maps 
‘n-clause-BSD’ to ‘bsd-n’, we get (marginally) fewer requests to 
add ‘missing’ licences, all is well with the world.

It's true that the 0-clause BSD licence was based on the ISC text; 
that doesn't make it any less of a BSD licence.  That requires 
claiming that OpenBSD is not under a BSD licence either, which is 
a... certain kind of correct.

Kind regards,

T G-R