From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id +PYwHMeOBmRF6gAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 07 Mar 2023 02:09:27 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6L4eHMeOBmTqsQAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 07 Mar 2023 02:09:27 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E36445DA4 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 02:09:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pZLpA-0003zQ-To; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:09:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pZLp8-0003yv-H2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:09:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pZLp8-0004lz-4W for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:09:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZLp8-0006YZ-1M for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:09:02 -0500 Subject: bug#61056: [PATCH] gnu: Add jwm. Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 01:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 61056 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Feng Shu Cc: 61056-done@debbugs.gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: 61056@debbugs.gnu.org, iyzsong@envs.net, tumashu@163.com Received: via spool by 61056-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D61056.167815130825158 (code D ref 61056); Tue, 07 Mar 2023 01:09:01 +0000 Received: (at 61056-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2023 01:08:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44033 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZLoa-0006Xh-Ev for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:08:28 -0500 Received: from mail.envs.net ([5.199.136.28]:57676) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZLoY-0006XZ-TR for 61056-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:08:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (mail.envs.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.envs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96C138A0876; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 01:08:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=envs.net; s=modoboa; t=1678151302; bh=rU63hjqKLckWT6fjQIjxHR309UPQ88fK5/2GMyV/IV8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q4W06LlAKqvNqxcHPnXzisnB1WC0Fo4ijPMzCiQyAijuZ560YjgoaXT4pGcjQILOL +XHtnelmVU2+eRgUHHzOpWFQ51EzuWMZV9QMiRoa+Rp0oK1/zX9sM4nu2NYWNxbZ0s DWfMIg7E7FOAmK23Jy0SEBDNP5Xxk2mdRnXNU8zlLG0iRDhKqZ7y/0YN8OEMWQcoAp Dz/ZcRoO6OVf2fB+Nbh0k7GlgkIdfXBt6PJ4I4Ehp5kVklULkjZC0r77HKHnt/TUXN AKypzcAtLQ3ShkHpVDrp/9z6Uu9pJqelJdnqd11B0uQwKlGPV/kBrm3t/uQz3YnmDu sKAZ3zm2egORHbuyligLsloH09Fy+KGPgqaaOesbGmSsDTfS49c5PLlkzxGv7VEPNC LP+3rdmdfL63JFqzyhQoJCkdOH1yQ3P2IaPKQq5RZkLGSQNAzybvXA+tDka7zaLF5H uXAupPGc88Vt9BUx1+5yZWQFwjHMPoQRAqXRXoK73bO3SoA+Ael1BiJcWYYSYLC9nu /ZKcQ5npWp4CSjCmS2Iz0Mjf78QZKJ86HGIWbIZerZ6F328/szEh8bWAL1WpWbr5sE KMxbCm8LGGtvswiglhoJr+yJje4gP0sjoKvcXTB6KvXxJBwxLlbXdoQrdLQDwOHyFw MkLGOlZEvBzdqprR79ZVglS4= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.envs.net Received: from mail.envs.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.envs.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id D6ffu7HjMM_8; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 01:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [182.150.116.135]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.envs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 01:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [local]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id a781db50; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 01:08:37 +0000 (UTC) References: <20230125111514.5194-1-tumashu@163.com> <87mt5homto.fsf@163.com> <874jqyqq3r.fsf_-_@envs.net> <877cvudqpk.fsf@163.com> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 09:08:37 +0800 In-Reply-To: <877cvudqpk.fsf@163.com> (Feng Shu's message of "Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:11:51 +0800") Message-ID: <874jqxnzai.fsf_-_@envs.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= X-ACL-Warn: , =?utf-8?b?5a6L5paH5q2mIHZpYSBHdWl4LXBhdGNoZXM=?= From: =?utf-8?b?5a6L5paH5q2mIHZpYSBHdWl4LXBhdGNoZXM=?= via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1678151366; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-to: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=rU63hjqKLckWT6fjQIjxHR309UPQ88fK5/2GMyV/IV8=; b=DP3ue9aKomWa4G8AwO/dAT8VicO28jnWauYlwR7lmJn+kReKxSD64Tf6WW9WIv0jWfPxYE MvkpIPrMIcy0HiV00l8K6O8WIS5N9WZ5/W6S73mYyVOKsQLHBahs/Vh5A+e5xKoL2Ws00V ROpS8BITfrqGA2IEizUVJTCekQcw1KBLjvC0JcSFvf7QuVs0Q5WGzYulPMU4dm6KCsObAv rChkYhnjeZVXEbZK+8yf73cr9LuNP9D/7e4Gk6W89rXQ40FGDZAdxrU8vlACOljOgJGrZ6 mYdB0Xx/ZTtjqxafnlglSv5VSd+386Dj8+WdYpcqrIkk7Mh1QX3f9cqGnTQYiA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=envs.net header.s=modoboa header.b=Q4W06LlA; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1678151366; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=UZ0NN6/B5vF/dd19F+G4041MCsHSC9UYRqtjBEo69FTD/bsT6+lis/i+GQjPiovW1R3C2m RdtAHMsIQoZpRJnDuSPszf8/wL6wWgpqPfhTqlDsDU0BK2hek+0GoqFUHnVTIK4mkxCHtF L4zXFhquH7zzmizI8cj3xDGi+K8904dKVhPlwNeXspPTSD7yflXyZSxtcYCUZQI4ufcH0K tPK4/j2CJuddT17bh8vh3Qh/GdiIcaw42CdNjtglimbZmtRGIKcliR3mUZIwxFFVXMMjkA wqNSUFptFTLpF6dCDUDI/W9vuOYqFuWTWwJyw8ReyFp3T66Y3ICsYqOCfVMSYg== Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=envs.net header.s=modoboa header.b=Q4W06LlA; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.21 X-Spam-Score: -2.21 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E36445DA4 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: 5mTzxifcPB+i Feng Shu writes: > =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 writes: > >> Feng Shu writes: >> >>> Hello: >>> >>> Please review v8 version of jwm/mjwm patch. >>> >>> Thanks >> >> Hello, I have pushed jwm and mjwm with follow changes: >> >> 1. remove tango-icon-theme, mjwm, xterm from jwm's inputs. see 2. >> >> 2. remove patch-example.jwmrc and install-tango-icon-files phases. >> I think those kind of customization better happend in ~/.jwmrc or >> a home service. >>=20=20=20=20 >> 3. change libxrandr to libxrender for jwm, as the latter is actually >> used... >> >> 4. mjwm: remove '.' in synopsis, change license to 'license:gpl2+'. >> >> >> What do you think of my changes in 1. and 2.? > > no problem. Pushed, thank you!