From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id OG+5MB9L5WT8bwEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 01:56:15 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id WBerMB9L5WQs3QAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 01:56:15 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DCED40C60 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 01:56:15 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=M6SSzwC2; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1692748575; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=nt+QYWar40FcOXIbGwc65ATol7Lohdrhl6SRCh0Yolg=; b=rbAzgOPqyxJ3fNBtTIgxjMP5nNIMHwdVAjjD0gowmqwG9BCJbg+OuB3neKtU2m0Zr9ULtL 7cN7v2zqzypQxnCxP8AkTppDNc2/Iaq6wamVn3MoS27kKFt6wZCVSp8cxm89AjY4dV4XrL bC2LTMx37Qd8FnknB/SIIbjDzxCY29JLOMNR0ILLb9F6QpUXlpCojL8k0iTQK2cWfhGuPn bGaIwZlUiFYU/FsV/ps8mXtm+gcsSJy25StR/Fjayqn1Wwzgvw1+JHZgk+goITjxTs3fwc KV8++ho4asYPceXB3n5AEBk0cfhkWu4qUpM9lNUzwNN5QLr1MHEil4zvQRqEew== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1692748575; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=eCOyvH2O87uA+v/UT5xRTmqvQ+elQqtut8Nq3oz8qNilPYxfVIMIA8FiSb4nzUa3ubPsn3 m1ZWyg/29WGOFAtf+y4f4oHZhrJX3dGUurzYWAvxlQOkxn+OoUwnl5rdOOxHei+kadigL2 BsDbFxsEG8Y409dEr0kmFV6W7UBeoUlBCkEKSS8MREuOgvaqpm+sXudCKEdgNBF4zomiU8 +wHmq3a0nRqO+lBq58JdknZxOnG0pZwWy1MO3JC0oqZ/npVRIp2I1YHCqukXbE3UA90XCh zSCCggT1BbxZ8CYCqQ97VveQFbvUbKKNBQstrXE5x3g6UJ4etFurfsWBCSjZgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=M6SSzwC2; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYbE9-00030O-A3; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:56:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYbE7-000306-Ko for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:55:59 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYbE7-00024W-CJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:55:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qYbEA-0007PY-30 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#65391: People need to report failing builds even though we have ci.guix.gnu.org for that Resent-From: Csepp Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 23:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65391 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxime Devos Cc: 65391@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 65391@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.169274855228470 (code B ref -1); Tue, 22 Aug 2023 23:56:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2023 23:55:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60621 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qYbDz-0007P8-Ll for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:55:52 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:37534) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qYbDx-0007Om-JF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:55:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYbDn-0002z7-KD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:55:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYbDk-0001xb-RW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:55:39 -0400 Received: from fews01-sea.riseup.net (fews01-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.109]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RVmSP3QpHzDqj1; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 23:55:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1692748533; bh=cpH6Fp8iVWoQRHSzGbWdMB+QzZnGOZ6j+pGpe/qImbU=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=M6SSzwC2eWHxgwRVLbL0kVh6C7Jtdv6lcSyjJUrRPoQuWlisKFXk3qn2x2phONH5d +mNd+M/y/Z/attr07/kIF2pTMSOUhHgdldQI7OH5aMdISHEqUyz+hIued87yqikSc7 HEcyxXQ6tBjlP+AEumwoMuAvD3Fr0WndIhRqc/f0= X-Riseup-User-ID: D69C40C01EC4E0FC1DE750835721F1626D94C706BE27175F72B563DB060C77C3 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews01-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4RVmSN4F12zJp2H; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 23:55:32 +0000 (UTC) References: <295ef8c8-574a-4169-98f3-6d9aaeb773f1@telenet.be> From: Csepp Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 01:45:04 +0200 In-reply-to: <295ef8c8-574a-4169-98f3-6d9aaeb773f1@telenet.be> Message-ID: <874jkqeiox.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.91 X-Spam-Score: -4.91 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8DCED40C60 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx1.migadu.com X-TUID: h3I1Z7rK6N48 Maxime Devos writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > For example, naev used to work just fine, yet apparently it doesn't > anymore: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65390. > > Given that Guix has ci.guix.gnu.org, I would expect such new problems > to be detected and resolved early, and it was detected by > ci.guix.gnu.org, yet going by issues.guix.gnu.org it was never even > investigated. > > (Yes, there is a delay, but that doesn't matter at all, as there's > this dashboard .) > > Do people really need to report 33% of all jobs > (https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/668365/dashboard) before those failures > are taken seriously, instead of the =E2=80=98there don't seem to be that = much > more build failures from the core-updates/... merge, let's solve them > later (i.e., never)=E2=80=99 that seems to be status quo? > > Best regards, > Maxime Devos > > [2. OpenPGP public key --- application/pgp-keys; OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725= EE.asc]... > > [[End of PGP Signed Part]] I tried signing up to the CI mailing list and it immediately became overwhelming. Also the CI UI could use some improvements. I'm pretty sure I've mentioned this before, but there is no easy way to find out which inputs I need to fix to make a dependency failure disappear. I think everyone has better things to do than perform a linear search by hand. So I rely on my own installations for detecting errors, that way I at least know that I don't get flooded with notifications for packages I know nothing about. One possible improvement I have been thinking about is making it easy for users to filter CI output to the packages in their profile closure, so for example they would get advance notice of any broken packages *before* attempting to install them. Teams could also have their own filters.