André A. Gomes skribis: > Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > >> SBCL 2.3.8 didn't build on riscv64, so instead version 2.3.7 is used for >> now. It has been merged in master at >> 4f35ff1275e05be31f5d41464ccf147e9dbfd016. >> Let's close this issue and open a new one for a future update of SBCL >> (maybe 2.3.9 will fix the build failure). > > Hi Guillaume, > > Just for future reference, is there a way for me to check whether a SBCL > builds on all platforms when sending a patch? Thanks. For x86_64, i686, aarch64, armhf and powerpc64le, you can check on . However so far the CI doesn't have builds for riscv64, because it doesn't have riscv64 hardware. Efraim Flashner has a riscv64 board with Guix on it, and he is the one who tried building SBCL 2.3.8 and saw the failure. If you are using a Guix system, you could also add the qemu-binfmt-service-type to your system definition, which gives the possibility to build packages for some other architectures with: guix build -s riscv64-linux PACKAGE-NAME Unfortunately, qemu-binfmt has difficulties running SBCL on foreign architectures, and building SBCL for aarch64 or riscv64 on a x86_64 machine fails with an error about a missing tty or something like that. However, trying the build with qemu-binfmt can still be useful, because if compilation fails before getting to the tty error, it usually indicates that the package has an issue on this architecture.