From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gmime Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:41:32 +0100 Message-ID: <8738jfnrsj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ha7vn3pv.fsf@netris.org> <20140219092921.GB4694@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> <87ob238kzb.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WG7PA-00029r-M2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:41:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WG7P5-0005H9-Ng for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:41:40 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:54200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WG7P5-0005H4-GT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:41:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87ob238kzb.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2014 05:17:44 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Mark H Weaver skribis: > Andreas Enge writes: > >> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:09:16PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>> This adds gmime, another step toward notmuch (mail). >>> + #:use-module (srfi srfi-1)) >> >> Is this module needed in the sense that the solution is preferable to wh= at >> is done, for instance, to determine the file name of qt? > > The code in the qt recipe removes everything after (and including) the > last period. I think that's not as robust, because it fails to properly > handle a version number with more (or less) than 3 components. > > srfi-1 is very widely used. It is certainly already loaded already, so > importing it is a cheap operation. > > What do you think? Fine with me. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.