From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: Libtool Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 10:20:35 -0600 Message-ID: <87389rvxgs.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20141109092619.GA8425@debian> <87d28wtgew.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnrhO-0007d1-4V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:20:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnrhI-0002NL-EF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:20:14 -0500 In-reply-to: <87d28wtgew.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ludovic Courtès writes: > Andreas Enge skribis: > >> I need a newer libtool, and thought it would have to go into core-updates. But: >> $ guix refresh -l libtool >> Building the following 93 packages would ensure 162 dependent packages are rebuilt >> >> So should I update in master instead? > > core-updates, please: Guile depends on it, and everything depends > on Guile. > > (Now, you’ve probably found a good case for Eric to study. ;-)) The dependents count for libtool would probably be fixed with my yet-to-be-pushed rewrite with the bags API. I'm still working out some kinks with the bootstrap packages, but should have something soon :) -- Eric Bavier Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html