* Handling ‘file’ CVE
@ 2014-11-13 10:41 Ludovic Courtès
2014-11-13 13:00 ` Andreas Enge
2014-11-13 16:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2014-11-13 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guix-devel, Mark H. Weaver
Commit 3940c5c makes a replacement for ‘file’, so that the new version
of file (5.20), which fixes a security vulnerability, is now grafted
onto packages that are installed.
I wonder if using a replacement makes sense here, because few packages
actually retain a dependency on ‘file’, and since grafting is
conservative, we graft anything that might retain a dependency on
‘file’, which means everything.
What about this other option: make another public package, ‘file-5.20’,
next to ‘file’, such that when a user explicitly installs ‘file’, they
get the new one?
That won’t address people referring to ‘file’ (the variable) in their OS
configuration, though.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Handling ‘file’ CVE
2014-11-13 10:41 Handling ‘file’ CVE Ludovic Courtès
@ 2014-11-13 13:00 ` Andreas Enge
2014-11-13 13:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-11-13 16:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2014-11-13 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix-devel
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:41:17AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Commit 3940c5c makes a replacement for ‘file’, so that the new version
> of file (5.20), which fixes a security vulnerability, is now grafted
> onto packages that are installed.
From what it looks like on hydra, this triggered a complete rebuild of
everything...
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Handling ‘file’ CVE
2014-11-13 13:00 ` Andreas Enge
@ 2014-11-13 13:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2014-11-13 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: Guix-devel
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:41:17AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Commit 3940c5c makes a replacement for ‘file’, so that the new version
>> of file (5.20), which fixes a security vulnerability, is now grafted
>> onto packages that are installed.
>
> From what it looks like on hydra, this triggered a complete rebuild of
> everything...
It’s a grafting of everything, not a rebuild, so this is expected to be
much faster as noted in the manual.
Still, I agree it’s annoying to see this overhead on Hydra.
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Handling ‘file’ CVE
2014-11-13 10:41 Handling ‘file’ CVE Ludovic Courtès
2014-11-13 13:00 ` Andreas Enge
@ 2014-11-13 16:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-11-13 18:03 ` Mark H Weaver
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2014-11-13 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guix-devel
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> What about this other option: make another public package, ‘file-5.20’,
> next to ‘file’, such that when a user explicitly installs ‘file’, they
> get the new one?
I ended up taking that route, in commit 310081e.
The replacement caused too much churn on Hydra. Furthermore, it led to
a serious increase in the installation image size, because several
variants of a number of packages were present, and because
‘guix-register -p’ doesn’t deduplicate things.
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Handling ‘file’ CVE
2014-11-13 16:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2014-11-13 18:03 ` Mark H Weaver
2014-11-13 18:47 ` Eric Bavier
2014-11-13 20:43 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark H Weaver @ 2014-11-13 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix-devel
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>
>> What about this other option: make another public package, ‘file-5.20’,
>> next to ‘file’, such that when a user explicitly installs ‘file’, they
>> get the new one?
>
> I ended up taking that route, in commit 310081e.
FWIW, I think it would be better for 'file' to be bound to the fixed
package, and to add a 'file/fixed' that points to the old buggy one.
Then 'file/fixed' could be used in some selected places.
'file' is used as a plain input (as opposed to native-input) in several
places that make me a bit nervous, e.g. the 'transmission' bittorrent
client (is 'file' being used at runtime on downloaded files?), and also
'aegis', 'quilt', and 'cmake'.
Finally, 'file' is a propagated-input for 'intltool', which means that
if anyone installs 'intltool' in their profile, they will have the buggy
'file' in their PATH.
Regards,
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Handling ‘file’ CVE
2014-11-13 18:03 ` Mark H Weaver
@ 2014-11-13 18:47 ` Eric Bavier
2014-11-13 20:13 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-11-13 20:43 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eric Bavier @ 2014-11-13 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark H Weaver; +Cc: Guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 246 bytes --]
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Finally, 'file' is a propagated-input for 'intltool', which means that
> if anyone installs 'intltool' in their profile, they will have the buggy
> 'file' in their PATH.
The attached patch might be enough to fix this.
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gnu-intltool-Make-file-a-regular-input.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1583 bytes --]
From fff25ec0451a65ccd5972d16ef96221c85084566 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Bavier <bavier@member.fsf.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:46:04 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: intltool: Make file a regular input.
* gnu/packages/glib.scm (intltool)[propagated-inputs]: Move file from here...
[inputs]: to here.
[arguments]: New 'patch-file-references phase.
---
gnu/packages/glib.scm | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm
index 9076643..212d3b6 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm
@@ -250,16 +250,21 @@ bindings to call into the C library.")
(base32
"01j4yd7i84n9nk4ccs6yifg84pp68nr9by57jdbhj7dpdxf5rwk7"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
+ (inputs
+ `(("file" ,file)))
(propagated-inputs
`(;; Propagate gettext because users expect it to be there, and so does
;; the `intltool-update' script.
("gettext" ,gnu-gettext)
- ;; `file' is used by `intltool-update' too.
- ("file" ,file)
-
("perl-xml-parser" ,perl-xml-parser)
("perl" ,perl)))
+ (arguments
+ `(#:phases (alist-cons-after
+ 'unpack 'patch-file-references
+ (lambda _
+ (substitute* "intltool-update.in"
+ (("`file") (string-append "`" (which "file"))))))))
(home-page "https://launchpad.net/intltool/+download")
(synopsis "Tools to centralise translations of different file formats")
(description
--
1.7.9.5
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 133 bytes --]
--
Eric Bavier
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Handling ‘file’ CVE
2014-11-13 18:47 ` Eric Bavier
@ 2014-11-13 20:13 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-11-13 20:42 ` Eric Bavier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2014-11-13 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Bavier; +Cc: Guix-devel
Eric Bavier <ericbavier@gmail.com> skribis:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> Finally, 'file' is a propagated-input for 'intltool', which means that
>> if anyone installs 'intltool' in their profile, they will have the buggy
>> 'file' in their PATH.
>
> The attached patch might be enough to fix this.
But ‘guix refresh -l’ says 142 packages depend on it...
> From fff25ec0451a65ccd5972d16ef96221c85084566 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Eric Bavier <bavier@member.fsf.org>
> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:46:04 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: intltool: Make file a regular input.
>
> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (intltool)[propagated-inputs]: Move file from here...
> [inputs]: to here.
> [arguments]: New 'patch-file-references phase.
[...]
> + (arguments
> + `(#:phases (alist-cons-after
> + 'unpack 'patch-file-references
> + (lambda _
> + (substitute* "intltool-update.in"
> + (("`file") (string-append "`" (which "file"))))))))
Should use (string-append (assoc-ref inputs "file") "/bin/file") to work
correctly in a cross-compilation context.
Also, the last argument to ‘alist-cons-after’ is missing.
Could you push the updated patch to ‘core-updates’? We’ll see how where
it takes us.
The main limitation here is that it takes almost a week for the MIPS
machine to rebuild everything (~2 days for Intel), and I’d like
everything to be built on the D-day.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Handling ‘file’ CVE
2014-11-13 20:13 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2014-11-13 20:42 ` Eric Bavier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eric Bavier @ 2014-11-13 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix-devel
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Eric Bavier <ericbavier@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Mark H Weaver writes:
>>
>>> Finally, 'file' is a propagated-input for 'intltool', which means that
>>> if anyone installs 'intltool' in their profile, they will have the buggy
>>> 'file' in their PATH.
>>
>> The attached patch might be enough to fix this.
>>
>> + (arguments
>> + `(#:phases (alist-cons-after
>> + 'unpack 'patch-file-references
>> + (lambda _
>> + (substitute* "intltool-update.in"
>> + (("`file") (string-append "`" (which "file"))))))))
>
> Should use (string-append (assoc-ref inputs "file") "/bin/file") to work
> correctly in a cross-compilation context.
I thought that might need to be done, but couldn't think why. Thanks
for providing the reason ;)
> Also, the last argument to ‘alist-cons-after’ is missing.
I noticed that soon after I emailed the patch.
> Could you push the updated patch to ‘core-updates’? We’ll see how where
> it takes us.
Will do.
> The main limitation here is that it takes almost a week for the MIPS
> machine to rebuild everything (~2 days for Intel), and I’d like
> everything to be built on the D-day.
That would be nice, yes.
--
Eric Bavier
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Handling ‘file’ CVE
2014-11-13 18:03 ` Mark H Weaver
2014-11-13 18:47 ` Eric Bavier
@ 2014-11-13 20:43 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2014-11-13 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark H Weaver; +Cc: Guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 533 bytes --]
Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:
> FWIW, I think it would be better for 'file' to be bound to the fixed
> package, and to add a 'file/fixed' that points to the old buggy one.
> Then 'file/fixed' could be used in some selected places.
>
> 'file' is used as a plain input (as opposed to native-input) in several
> places that make me a bit nervous, e.g. the 'transmission' bittorrent
> client (is 'file' being used at runtime on downloaded files?), and also
> 'aegis', 'quilt', and 'cmake'.
This script helps determine this:
[-- Attachment #2: the script --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1167 bytes --]
(use-modules (guix) (gnu)
(gnu packages file)
(ice-9 match)
(srfi srfi-1)
(srfi srfi-26))
(define (file-input? inputs)
(find (match-lambda
((label (? package? p) . _)
(eq? p file))
(_ #f))
inputs))
(define (packages-using-file)
(fold-packages (lambda (package result)
(if (or (file-input? (package-inputs package))
(file-input? (package-propagated-inputs package)))
(cons package result)
result))
'()))
(define (has-runtime-dependency-on-file? package)
(with-store store
(let* ((file (package-full-name file))
(drv (package-derivation store package))
(outs (map cdr (derivation->output-paths drv)))
(info (substitutable-path-info store outs)))
(find (lambda (info)
(find (cut string-suffix? file <>)
(substitutable-references info)))
info))))
(define (packages-with-runtime-dependency-on-file)
(filter has-runtime-dependency-on-file?
(packages-using-file)))
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 784 bytes --]
The result is:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guile-user)> (packages-with-runtime-dependency-on-file)
$8 = (#<package quilt-0.61 gnu/packages/patchutils.scm:85 41f5240> #<package aegis-4.24 gnu/packages/version-control.scm:491 383c240>)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
These two packages are leaves, so it’s fine to change them to use the
fixed ‘file’. Done in 351d690.
> Finally, 'file' is a propagated-input for 'intltool', which means that
> if anyone installs 'intltool' in their profile, they will have the buggy
> 'file' in their PATH.
This one is more problematic. We can try to apply Eric’s patch, but
that’s a lot of rebuild.
Thanks for the analysis,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-13 20:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-13 10:41 Handling ‘file’ CVE Ludovic Courtès
2014-11-13 13:00 ` Andreas Enge
2014-11-13 13:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-11-13 16:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-11-13 18:03 ` Mark H Weaver
2014-11-13 18:47 ` Eric Bavier
2014-11-13 20:13 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-11-13 20:42 ` Eric Bavier
2014-11-13 20:43 ` Ludovic Courtès
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.