From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add bwa.
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 19:30:10 +0100
Message-ID: <873857xwi5.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <idja8zizbt7.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<871tkr3dei.fsf@gnu.org> <877fujk7nz.fsf@mango.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56102)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YWqpH-0001qE-F9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 14:30:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YWqpC-0001dy-Eu
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 14:30:19 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58845)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1YWqpC-0001du-Bf
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 14:30:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <877fujk7nz.fsf@mango.localdomain> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of
	"Sat, 14 Mar 2015 14:52:48 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes:
>
>>> +    (synopsis "Burrows-Wheeler aligner")
>>
>> s/aligner/genome sequence aligner/ or something like that.
>
> Is a change to "Burrows-Wheeler sequence aligner" acceptable?  I don't
> think "sequence aligner" has any other meaning in this context (and in
> combination with "Burrows-Wheeler").

Yes, sounds good.

>>> +    (license license:gpl3)))
>>
>> GPLv3-only?
>
> Yes, just GPLv3 as far as I can tell.  The usual upgrade clause is
> nowhere to be found in the source tree.

If there are no file headers or documents specifying the version, then
it=E2=80=99s effectively GPLv3+ (actually it=E2=80=99s even any version, pe=
r Section 14,
but we usually do GPLv3+ in this case.)

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.