From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Non Sequencer.
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 22:55:24 +0200
Message-ID: <87380lfao3.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87io9jffc9.fsf@elephly.net> <874ml1o5pl.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52621)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1ZGZ8w-0006Tf-0H
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 16:55:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1ZGZ8u-0002Du-NZ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 16:55:33 -0400
In-reply-to: <874ml1o5pl.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:
>
>> From 57265b8363add56ea0ea2f35310c39db7e2b14ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:46:44 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add NTK.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/fltk.scm (ntk): New variable.
>
> [...]
>
>> +    (license lgpl2.0)))
>
> Version 2.0-only?

I copied this from “fltk” because it’s a fork and the author wrote that
the license is the same as for “fltk”.  Now looking at the copyright
headers I see the “or later” clause repeatedly.  Does this mean that the
license for our “fltk” package is incorrect?  Should it not also be
“lgpl2.0+” then?

> Otherwise LGTM.
>
>> From f748fa7439382672a5951beee6d00fd0f6e80221 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:47:54 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add Non Sequencer.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/music.scm (non-sequencer): New variable.
>
> OK!

Thanks for the review!

~~ Ricardo