From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#20433: Keyboard not working on laptop with guixSD Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:36:02 +0100 Message-ID: <8737t7jn3x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877fknsot2.fsf@gnu.org> <874meh4kx3.fsf@gnu.org> <87egdkbj5k.fsf@tsyesika.se> <87pox4v62m.fsf@gnu.org> <87twmgjm1j.fsf@tsyesika.se> <87egdi36ug.fsf@elephly.net> <87vb6tbpca.fsf@gnu.org> <87bn8l37pu.fsf@elephly.net> <87lh7n52mo.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRgZS-0000Dm-Lw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:37:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRgZM-0006d6-Fb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:37:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52566) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRgZM-0006cQ-Bz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:37:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRgZK-00078v-3B for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:37:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87lh7n52mo.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:15:27 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Jessica Tallon , 20433@debbugs.gnu.org ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> >>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis: >>> >>>> So, using HIDBP is probably wrong and might very well be the cause. >>>> Looking at the module names again I searched the logs for =E2=80=9Cusb= kbd=E2=80=9D and, >>>> yes, the GuixSD logs contain this line: >>>> >>>> usbcore: registered new interface driver usbkbd >>> >>> Do you think we should remove usbkbd from (gnu system linux-initrd)? >>> Is there another module we should load instead? >> >> I don=E2=80=99t know why one would want to use =E2=80=9Cusbkbd=E2=80=9D = and thus HIDBP. As far >> as I understand =E2=80=9Cusbhid=E2=80=9D should be sufficient. > > Looking at the description you pasted, I agree with you. > I=E2=80=99ve removed usbkbd loading in commit b153f9f. > > Jessica, could you confirm one way or another that usbkbd is the > culprit? That adding =E2=80=98hid-apple=E2=80=99 solves the problem was confirmed at and fixed in cc023e3. The fix will be in 0.9.1. Closing the bug. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.