From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Releasing 0.9.1
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 22:21:43 +0100
Message-ID: <8737t2dhjs.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87d1sbi827.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39197)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>) id 1aStFq-0007Vy-Ly
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 16:21:55 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>) id 1aStFp-0001jy-Us
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 16:21:54 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87d1sbi827.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:46:24 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> Seriously, I think we should be aiming for a release by the end of the
> month.  Here a few rather low-hanging fruits that I think we should
> address:
>
[...]
>   =E2=80=A2 The =E2=80=98guile@1.8=E2=80=99 syntax patch.  Mathieu?

I didn't relook into it yet.  I will try to find some time to work on it
this weekend.

--
Mathieu Lirzin