From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp
	file.
Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 22:05:24 +0300
Message-ID: <8737p20zrf.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <1464358215-4416-1-git-send-email-dthompson2@worcester.edu>
	<87lh2ujiu3.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57906)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1b6jY8-0000hV-78
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:05:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1b6jY4-0002EE-4s
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:05:27 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87lh2ujiu3.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sat, 28 May 2016 17:36:04 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2016-05-28 18:36 +0300) wrote:

> David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:
>
>> * guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm (gnu:unpack)
>> (store-file->elisp-source-file, unpack): New procedures.
>> (%standard-phases): Use the new unpack procedure.
>
> Good idea, LGTM!
>
> Could you adjust users of =E2=80=98uncompressed-file-fetch=E2=80=99 in a =
subsequent
> commit, and remove =E2=80=98uncompressed-file-fetch=E2=80=99?

I object!  I mean this should be discussed at least.  I would really
prefer to keep (and document) 'uncompressed-file-fetch' and not to
update emacs-build-system for this case.  It is possible, that once
we'll need to handle non-compressed files for another build system.  So
it should also be adjusted in the same way.  But if we keep
'uncompressed-file-fetch', it will be a general decision as it can be
used for any build system.

--=20
Alex